Participation Article Review- GIS & Law Enforcement
Review by Karen F. Mathews.
GIS Applications, 5100 L
Article: Chapter 24,
Using GIS to Identify Drug Markets and Reduce Drug Related Violence. Article was presented as a Summary of an award given for the 2006
Herman Goldstein Award for Problem Oriented Policing. Subtitle: A Data-Driven Strategy to
Implement a Focused Deterrence Model and Understand the Elements of Drug
Markets.
Author: Eleazer D.
Hunt, Marty Sumner, Thomas J. Scholten
and James M. Frabutt
Law enforcement officials in High Point, North Carolina
sought to break the cycle of drug related crimes and the violence connected to
drug dealing in their small mountain community. A problem found nationwide in largest of
cities and the smallest towns. The
accepted modius operandi to address the drug problem nationwide had been the combined
methods of surveillance, undercover drug buys and routine mass drug sweeps by
law enforcement. Instead of lowering the
presence of drug activity these standard procedures over time have increased
community suspicion and distrust for law enforcement officials in general. High Point’s goal was to use a new approach
to an old problem. Breaking the cycle
of police distrust, drug activity and creating a continued community ownership
model of expected neighborhood behavior is the nexus of the data-driven focused
deterrence method described in this article. The
objective is using an intervention deterrence program instead of a punishment
model. However, it is the essential GIS
techniques which were used to develop an objective data set for the target
intervention zone that made the project “doable”, successful and later replicatible.
To do an intervention, the High Point department needed to
find the most suitable neighborhood zone and turned to GIS to assist with the
task. A decision was made to use a
single prior year as the source of data collection. Data consisted of 911 calls, police reports, drug arrest, field
contacts and specific drug related crimes categorized as serious. GIS changed the data use approach from a
purely police perspective “Where are the
drugs?, Let’s go there;” to a workflow question: “Where are there densities of
violent, sex or weapons crimes spatially concurrent with drug sales?” (pg 398).
Kernel density maps made on each layer
were used as the primary analysis technique.
As described in the article, several initial hypothesis were changed by
the use of GIS in selecting the intervention neighborhood:
1) False hot spots
were identified as default report locations;
2) most serious crime arrests were not associated with drug
activity;
3) the housing complex wasn’t the best place to have an
intervention; and
4) a smaller number of individuals were directly
involved in the sale of drugs.
Selecting the exact zone required cooperative efforts
between GIS analysis and selected police activity to locate the particular
community and persons to be approached with the intervention techniques. GIS was able through spatial analysis to
develop a visual spatial structure of a drug market. An intervention site was chosen in the West
End neighborhood and carried out.
No comments:
Post a Comment